Method
How Devpipeline Base builds an institutional versus retail sentiment comparison — from instrument lock to walkthrough.
Financial market analysis at this desk has one centre of gravity: institutional versus retail sentiment comparison. The method below is what clients buy — not a black box, not a daily blast.
Lock the instrument list and window
We refuse open-ended “watch the market” briefs. You name the equities, index futures, FX pairs, or listed commodities, and the session window that matters — a policy day, a roll, an earnings cluster, or a simple week ahead.
Separate the two camps on purpose
Institutional posture is read through flow proxies, positioning reports where available, and desk colour we can stand behind. Retail posture is read through brokerage survey tone, crowd positioning patterns, and known retail-heavy venues. Mixing the two into one vague “sentiment” score is exactly what we avoid.
Mark divergence, convergence, and flips
For each instrument we state whether the camps agree, disagree, or have recently flipped relative to the prior window. Disagreement is not automatically a trade — it is a risk and timing signal you still have to interpret against your own book.
Write a spare note, then walk it
The deliverable is a concise written comparison plus a live session with the analyst. Charts appear only when they clarify the split; we do not decorate the note with unrelated market colour.
Addendum when the print lands
If a major data or policy print hits on the walkthrough day, you receive a short addendum within 24 hours. Continuous monitoring after that is outside the briefing unless you commission another window.
What this method is not
It is not a substitute for licensed investment advice, not a promise of directional accuracy, and not a software product you log into. It is prepared analytical work for people who already trade or allocate capital and want the institutional–retail split stated clearly.
See the offer
Browse briefings or request a date with your instrument list.